O Rourke on the trade collapses

"Two Great Trade Collapses: The Interwar Period & Great Recession Compared" Fee Download
CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12286
KEVIN O'ROURKE, University of Oxford
Email: kevin.orourke@all-souls.ox.ac.uk
In this paper, I offer some preliminary comparisons between the trade collapses of the Great Depression and Great Recession. The commodity composition of the two trade collapses was quite similar, but the latter collapse was much sharper due to the spread of manufacturing across the globe during the intervening period. The increasing importance of manufacturing also meant that the trade collapse was more geographically balanced in the later episode. Protectionism was much more severe during the 1930s than after 2008, and in the UK case at least helped to skew the direction of trade away from multilateralism and towards Empire. This had dangerous political consequences. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

unpacking the possibility of deglobalisation

Finbarr Livesey argues that  he interpretation of the global economy has been framed as an inevitable journey towards ever greater integration—a story of hyper-globalisation. This article discusses the nature of manufacturing to understand whether this interpretation holds and to investigate the possibility of deglobalisation at the level of physical goods trade in the coming decades, and what that may imply for other non-physical elements of globalisation.
Read more

Liberal peace and deglobalization

We may have reached a stage where economic interactions have become so internationalised that further increases in globalisation cannot deliver greater prospects of peace. But the logic of the capitalist peace still holds water; the intricate nature of the economic interdependence between advanced market economies almost entirely rules out war, but other hostile attitudes can still persist, and even grow.  - Mansoob Murshed on deglobalization and the liberal peace
Read more